You’ll have the flexibility to work as much or as little as you choose - 20hrs/week is suggested, but not a limit.
-
@[email protected] @[email protected] Oh, I mean, definitely, I agree, like obviously they're trying to push it and it would have worked. But it's obviously bullshit they had to. I feel like if you accept "phrenology but with a computer" you should not get to be a journal anymore because what the fuck is even the point of you being a gatekeeper if you can't keep the goddamned debunked science out?
-
I've seen them. Researched a bit. Stayed away.
-
This post is deleted!
-
We _already_ have this problem
Much easier to generate bullshit than to refute it; it's 2nd law of thermodynamics all the way down
-
@aud @hipsterelectron @cthos Just suggesting anything vaguely adjacent to phrenology should be a lifetime ban from publishing in any journal or holding professorship at any university worldwide.
-
@aud @hipsterelectron @cthos Our institutions should have registers of "nazi adjacent pseudosciences" and the political will to state unequivocally that reviving anything resembling them is not an option and will result in complete excommunication from academia.
-
@dalias @aud @cthos our institutions could be able to misuse that so it shouldn't be self-regulation but rather an audit by an external authority at least. universities are able to retain a multitude of tax breaks which could easily be used to curb their behavior although i don't like the precedent of right wing governments making gender illegal there either
-
@hipsterelectron @aud @cthos My leaning would be more like professional ethics association/union imposing it.
-
-
d@nny "disc@" mc²replied to d@nny "disc@" mc² last edited by
-
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] it took a hot minute, but I did figure out where the contact author / PI is working. It was a little difficult since the paper has been retracted and isn’t really linked anywhere, but they are indeed a professor at a university… much to my displeasure.
-
@aud My reading is that "outlier AI" is the name of the company.
In other words, it's just saying "we'll pay you what we want to pay you" and doesn't necessarily mean that the ML model will set your salary.
Although I'm sure they're thinking about it.
-
@aud Outlier AI is the company they mention as their client: https://outlier.ai/
The post still looks sketchy, but they're not choosing your hourly rate based on a machine learning model.
-
@[email protected] ahhh. Jesus, they really need to stop adding “AI” to their freaking names…
Alright, not quite as blatantly sketchy regarding their payment… but definitely still garbage. Still! Thank you for bringing this up. I absolutely assumed it was an ML model deciding pay. -
@[email protected] ah yeah, I read the more recent reply first, but that does seem to be the case.
With them positioning themselves as an entire “AI hiring pipeline”, they’re not leaving much doubt to give them the benefit of. -
@aud I'm just so used to startups called "foobar AI" that seemed the obvious reading.
That's marketing techbro speak for "this is not a place of honor".
-
@aud @hipsterelectron I can't believe (yes I can) that they're out there fucking citing Lombroso?!
-
@aud @hipsterelectron what I genuinely cannot believe is that someone published new translations of Lombroso's writing in the early 2000s, and that's what they're citing
-
@aud @dalias @hipsterelectron @cthos we'll never find out who, but I'd like to have a word with their accepting reviewers more than anything
