This makes me want to scream and pull out my hair.
-
Molly Cranberries-Kraig 🦃replied to Artemis last edited by
Reduction to a mean pollutes the source for everyone. The idiocracification of humanity continues apace.
-
Seriously, I... I read the dictionary for _fun_ as a kid. I know that's not normal but I don't need robots bullying me for it.
Also, using a bot to determine if a bot wrote something is definitely a second layer of stupid.
"Well, the machine said it was written by a machine. Who else would know so well what a machine wrote than a machine? Hmm?"
The most reasonable response I can come up with to any of this is to burn it down. Just... Burn it down.
-
@artemis It’s worst in the form of AI but I also hate it in the form of increasingly opinionated “grammar and style” checkers built into every email and doc editing software now. If I couch a phrase in any but the most blunt terms I get little squiggles telling me that I’m communicating wrong.
Computers should not be telling humans how they’re allowed to use language. Humans should not be building programs which crush out variance and expressivity in language.
-
Yes, “Hunger Games for robots” is stupid AF: https://www.superversive.co/blog/hunger-games-for-robots
-
-
Incoming messages from your hairstylists automated scheduling system that communicates with your automated response system that checks with your automated scheduling system if you're available for an appointment on February 31st (because dates are hard) that checks if your heart rate monitoring system has reported a heartbeat in the last three days.
...
Burn it all down. It'd be better for everyone.
-
dataramareplied to Matt Hall last edited by [email protected]
@401matthall @paninid @artemis It would be better off for everyone *except* a small group of obscenely rich people.
(and weird misanthropic cultists.)
-
Natasha Nox 🇺🇦🇵🇸replied to Molly Cranberries-Kraig 🦃 last edited by
-
-