Hey #Fediverse #Musicians - I'm once again trying to figure out premium pricing for #Bandwagon

bri

@benpate oh yeah, i didn’t mean to get too pedantic and i hope it didn’t come off that way, i just was a bit confused by responses that seemed to think that would be particularly burdensome.

honestly i think the cc folks could try to communicate things better. i often see takes around cc (and especially cc0) that have me rather concerned folks are making decisions about their hard-earned work that they don’t fully grasp…

Ben Pate 🤘🏻

Not pedantic at all. And you're not the only person to make that distinction

@brhfl

Ben Pate 🤘🏻

I agree completely. No heroes.

This is the point that the whole Fediverse needs to truly embrace. The lack of a proper business model is a major piece that prevents us from being truly competing with the corporate silos.

There MUST be a way for people to have real careers on the Fediverse, and not just hobbies or side-hustles.

And, there's plenty of money in SaaS model. We just need to make it work here, too.

@mirlo @keefmarshall @sknob

Ben Pate 🤘🏻

I promise it'll be easy to set up and participate in federated searches. I've just stumbled into how Framasoft is doing this with PeerTube, and this will be pretty similar.

Still, this stuff is usually cheaper at larger scales, compared to very small ones. So a server with a few thousand artists will likely be cheaper-per-artist than one with a few dozen.

I *do* want to encourage artist communities to set up their own instances. We're just about ready to go..

@icaria36 @keefmarshall @sknob

Ben Pate 🤘🏻

Excellent point about bandwidth vs storage

I’d originally thought about putting “music streaming" in the premium category, so “downloads" might be free, but transcoding and streaming music real-time might cost something. It was nice because streaming requires extra work.

But that pricing punishes the smallest artists the most, b/c they're the ones who really need the streaming exposure. So I've ditched this for now.

Gosh, social justice is hard.

@icaria36 @axwax @keefmarshall @sknob

Ben Pate 🤘🏻

Not glib at all.. that's a realistic take on how the game is set up. And if we were playing by the rules, it would be near impossible to launch something like this.

Fortunately, we're not playing by the rules.

There's a few key differences that make this different, with the existing Fediverse network itself being a key strategic advantage.

I could talk shop all day long, but here's the bottom line:

@sknob @keefmarshall

Ben Pate 🤘🏻

The #Fediverse is dry tinder, primed for a forest fire of change.

#Bandwagon (among others) is the kindling,

and you all are the matches.

Change happens slowly, then all at once. And when the corporate silos no longer have a stranglehold over art and culture, people will flock to new networks (like this one) and the problem of ”covering hosting costs” will be a distant memory.

@sknob @keefmarshall

Andy Piper

@benpate @sknob @keefmarshall this has me tingling!

Ben Pate 🤘🏻

A) Thanks for checking out Bandwagon. It really means a lot!

b) Posting publicly works just fine for me, unless there's a reason you need privacy. I really like the idea of developing out in the open; it brings people together, which is even more powerful than whatever code I smash into the computer on a random Thursday.

I will do my best to remove as many barriers as I can. It's a lot to juggle, but worth the time.

@monarkie

Chris Trottier

@benpate Hey Ben, I have many ideas on how you can monetize your service, and I think it’s worth exploring opportunities beyond subscriptions.

Basically, I suggest:

1. Hosting
2. Customizations (e.g., themes)
3. Plug-ins
4. Patronage systems

I’d be happy to discuss in more details.

Ben Pate 🤘🏻

@atomicpoet yes. I would love that. maybe we set up a time next week?

Chris Trottier

@benpate Sure, apart from Monday, my calendar is open.

Ben Pate 🤘🏻

@atomicpoet

Well, that sounds like Tuesday. I’ll coordinate with you over DM