Ah yes, the 3 genders:- exclusively uses permissive licenses - "has licensing something under GPL ever helped my friends?"- exclusively uses copyleft licenses - "if companies use it they better contribute back"- exclusively uses anticapitalist and simi...
-
Ah yes, the 3 genders:
- exclusively uses permissive licenses - "has licensing something under GPL ever helped my friends?"
- exclusively uses copyleft licenses - "if companies use it they better contribute back"
- exclusively uses anticapitalist and similar licenses - "fuck companies" -
Lunawawa :neofox_snug: :therian:replied to Lunawawa :neofox_snug: :therian: last edited by
I can't tell you which of these is right but I'm in the second boat
-
neptunyl⁷-hydroxide :neptune:replied to Lunawawa :neofox_snug: :therian: last edited by
@[email protected] i use MPL now, so same i guess. I used to be 0BSD/MIT/ISC but then my reverse engineering work got packaged into a paid app and claimed they wrote it :blobbee_shrug:
-
Lunawawa :neofox_snug: :therian:replied to neptunyl⁷-hydroxide :neptune: last edited by
@ada I used to mostly go with GPL, nowadays mostly EUPL for new projects, I like the compatibility clause cause it lets people reuse the code in projects with many similar foss licenses
-
@lunareclipse @ada The EUPL is the GPLv3 plus legal attack surface cuz it falls back to GPL IIRC. It doesn’t offer anything more that I’m aware of.