Thanks for tagging me on this. I added a couple of new sections to https://privacy.thenexus.today/bluesky-atmosphere-fediverse/, one on "Some people in the ActivityPub Fediverse very much do not welcome Bluesky" (I've attached a screenshot from the start of that section) and another on "Are Bluesky and the ATmosphere decentralized?" (which also links to posts from @rwg, @possibledog, @rysiek, @jonny, @Kye, and a couple of people saying that Mastodon isn't decentralized (!)).A couple suggestions for your article ...in terms of how many accounts are federating from Threads, @laurenshof estimated at about 50,000the point about people suggesting changing Bridgy Fed to opt in are ignoring informed consent is a good one. It'd be helpful to also quote Mastodon's perspective that allow-list federation is "contrary to Mastodon’s mission of decentralization"the point about Mike M's work on nomadic identity is also a good one, although it's also important to highlight that when Bluesky surveyed the landscape in 2020-21, the ActivityPub standard and every ActivityPub implementer other than Mike had ignored this existing work and users' long-stated desire for data portability.Also, when you talk about how Bridgy Fed is "confusing less knowledgeable people about whether or not BS is part of the Fediverse or not", I'd appreciate you linking to my post to clarify just who you're insulting here -- not just me, but also Marco Rogers, Dr. Matt Lee of Gnu social, and the others in the attached screenshot who see Bluesky as part of today's Fediverse.@oblomov