The arrest of Telegram founder Pavel Durov in France for failure to moderate ANY form of content shows we may be rapidly approaching the point that it is not safe for controlling parties of any online service to travel internationally. As multiple countries draw up mutually incompatable laws about encryption, content moderation, and age verification, it will be impossible for most owners of sites complying with any one country's laws to determine their safety in any other country. The only exception will be very rigorously censored sites and services, possibly requiring prior approval of the site before anyone connected to it attempts to travel.I don't believe the Telegram case has anything to do with CSAM whatsoever, beyond that being the thin end of the wedge. The true motivation is almost certainly the hatred governments are showing towards any service or device that allows people to have a private conversation the police are unable to monitor. If they had their way, every phone would be a monitored prison phone.Note that cell phones are considered "contraband" in jails and prisons as they allow unmonitored communication. That isn't about fear of crime against the community directed from inside the prison! More likely its about fear that prisoners will be able to directly send retribution to the homes of wardens and guards.Now factor in the notion that countries and empires have been compared as a whole to prisons. The prisons within are the punishment block, SHU, "the hole," under this model. Now we see why governments fear encryption so much?