... reaction of "not wanting to politicize tech". More now accept that the interaction exists, and that we can shape tech somewhat to help or hinder certain political developments.The human rights policy considerations group may not have much direct influence on many protocol designers, but I feel they have paved the way with the guidance they issued for taking certain effects into consideration.They're now focused on the more specific interaction between tech and intimate partner violence.

... it's no longer enough to resolve names to IP addresses, you also have to resolve to choices of transport protocols.With encrypted transports, you always have a key exchange to deal with, which can be slow.The TLS issue is that you have a TCP handshake, which exchanges three packets. Once the TCP session is established, you have a TLS handshake, which is also three or more packets. QUIC adds key information from the start, so you only have one handshake that combines both purposes.So...

DINRG at #IETF121 made me feel a little bad, but also very good, in ways I didn't expect.First off, it's how I got there. Dirk Kutscher saw a previous talk I gave at #FOSDEM and asked me to repeat it there. So with a bunch of tweaking, I did.It was on how technological choices in the web drive its centralization, and it got a lot of feedback from the room, mostly positive I'd say. If you want, you can see it here:https://makertube.net/w/hRk3z3R7fue1dcJpZzN7vYWhat I didn't get is the impression that people...

@jens As @thisismissem points out, schema.org is not really specifying but suggesting types to be used, same with sdo-types as domain/range. If you want constraints you must define them yourself with Shex/Shacl or JSON Schema. For AMB, a schema.org-based metadata profile for educational resources on the web we chose JSON-LD plus a normative JSON Schema so that also people unfamiliar with RDF can easily use it: https://w3id.org/kim/amb/20231019 (German) JSON Schema: https://w3id.org/kim/amb/20231019/schemas/schema.json @helge

@jens The thing I note is that on Richard Stallman's own website, he links to the stallman support org site.There's no attempt to review his behaviour over the years and he seems to be perfectly happy to let others attempt to dox and harrass in his name.Any good leader would ask for better behaviour from their followers. Would make it clear that doxxing and harrassing in their name isn't acceptable.Note the crickets....