@ericleamen I'm still gonna analyse.Because Trump getting a 50% is still up to more than "she's a woman". The 2020 elections still had Trump at 50%. Harris lost, say, 10% because she's a woman, then got only 9% for being the only viable candidate.There's still place to analyse why, tf, did the democrats not achieve 50% although Harris is a woman; that is, why did she not get at least, say, 65% not considering mysogyny? Again, as the only widely-known viable candidate?Democrats losing is because she's a woman, yes, that was the straw that broke the camel's back. But what about everything else?Like, I'd completely agree with you, if it wasn't Trump that she was against.