I don't have a comprehensive list of them, but the very worrying statements by Lily about some of the victims mentioned above, obviously prompted people to go through their interactions with the victims to see if any of Lily's claims can be independently confirmed.
The interesting dynamic here was that the accusation (non-consensual sexual interactions, i.e. sexual abuse / rape) was made, and people would find tiny examples (non-consensual lewd messages) within chats, which would then be used to “prove” the initial claim. That is bogus, because someone wrote something to you it cannot be used out of context to "prove" a completely different thing.
This is one example of that, which is, currently existing, the only “evidence” against Aprl. It was used in the Afra Berlin to ban her from it, used by her sports club, used as a reason for her to be kicked out of her own software project, and also was the main reason people made up their minds about Aprl.
The original poster probably doesn't know about this, nor ever thought of them sharing their experience as leading to this, or being used as “evidence” for the initial claims in the first place, so do not blame them or anyone mentioned here. I think it is only correct to share your experiences with people in order to support what you think are victims. This cannot be seen as dogpiling, because it isn't. It's sharing a real experience, the fact people used it for other means is not the fault of the original creator.
The example mentioned here shows Aprl stating “when I'm horny”, seemingly out of context, then apologizing for it, saying it was early in the morning and she doesn't function well. She also told me, although I have no confirmation of this, that she apologized separately for this again later.
In the conversation itself this didn't seem to be a problem, but it's completely allowed to rethink about a conversation in the past and find it worrying, even if you initially didn't feel that way.
Early on in my conversations with Aprl, before any of this happened, I told her I wasn't comfortable with certain messages after a specific time, she immediately stopped writing those kind of messages. Before that I would say or do similar things, innuendo, etc. She would respond similarly. But whether she started it or I did doesn't, in my opinion, matter, because what's important is that she immediately stopped after I asked her to do so. I set my boundaries, she respected them. That is my personal experience and with that I do not want to devalue other people's experiences.
However, I think we'd all agree that it'd be wrong to go back through old chats, before I ever set any boundaries or told her those, and find messages she sent me that I reciprocated, or created an environment in which sending those messages was acceptable, and then other people claim it is evidence for other, far worse, allegations.
Again, I'd love to ask people to rethink whom they believed in the past and read all the stories of the victims. I don't claim to understand the full story, I've just spent the past months with many of the victims in order to help them, which is why I welcome so many people coming forward.