@onepict @MediaActivist @perpetrator @freetechproject

A question for all the grass rootsy #DIY crew out there. Are we going to link outside our little ghettos?

We need to get anywhere https://hamishcampbell.com/community-is-the-power-we-have/

Linking the Social Web Foundation (#SWF) to the #SocialHub, it's the process that is more important than the outcome. It's crucial to develop grassroots consensus processes that align with open, transparent governance. This can help manage the mess and delight of the libertarian, independent spirits often seen in open-source communities. Establishing a simple, ruff consensus allows people to mediate the mess-making and guide projects more efficiently. It encourages collective decision-making while respecting diverse views within the community.

Fostering this balance is essential for building a collaborative, effective path.

https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/proposal-linking-to-swf/4673

@MediaActivist @kathimmel @ophiocephalic

There is a project people have been working on for the last ten years that does this is #KISS and soughted #OMN

There have been quite a few, mostly funded projects, that have failed to do this over the last 20 years.

#techchurn is a real problem, we need to compost the #techshit as much as make more

To build consensus processes in #FOSS (Free and Open Source Software), we need to apply principles from radical activism, embracing messy democracy and affinity group organization:

* Messy Democracy: Encourage open discussions, differing perspectives. Keep open space for debates, ensuring that small, actionable steps are agreed upon, even if the path is not linear.

* Affinity Groups: Small, self-organized teams focus on tasks and goals. These groups can collaborate but retain autonomy, allowing for flexibility and diverse approaches to problem-solving.

* Focus: Start with a simple, shared purpose. Use tools like #KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid) to keep away from overcomplicating processes. Consensus should be loose but structured—avoid rigid hierarchies.

For example, in FOSS, we could implement a process where a proposal only moves forward if it gains a basic level of support (likes or votes), and participants have the ability to block with a justification, allowing for transparent pushback and refinement.

By fostering open processes (as in #4opens), trust is built, and solutions remain accessible and adaptable, promoting collective decision-making while keeping things practical.

I have extensive experience navigating radical activism and grassroots media projects. Having been involved in open technology movements, such as #Indymedia and #OMN (Open Media Network) and more recently the Fediverse and ActivityPub movement, emphasizing trust-based, DIY approaches. Thus, the critique of the #NGO sector for undermining radical efforts through the influence of funding and institutionalization, having witnessed how NGO paths often lead to stagnation or failure. In reaction to this, the creating and championing of decentralized solutions that remain faithful to their grassroots origins while resisting co-optation by the #mainstreaming.

For more details, visit hamishcampbell.com.