Damn, IETF is really stepping up enforcement.

"Death by chocolate" is just the more extreme form of "pain au chocolate"

@naught101 @gureito @dramypsyd but vampires aren't bound by the legal state, but by magical law that makes a person's home their realm. They also can't enter churches and other hallowed ground usually, and those are places open to the public that legally can be entered by anyone.

@juergen_hubert @mekkaokereke a lot of the structural racism in Germany targets immigrants and descendants of immigrants. For example the fact that getting German citizenship is nowhere near as easy as it should be.
Or, a rather strange example for a microaggression I would never have noticed before moving to the US: when you scan your passport at a Schengen border station, no matter where in Europe you are, the instructions automatically switch to German, with at least as I could tell, no obvious way to switch them to English, Turkish, or Vietnamese. It's something that in the US is relatively rare, federal things especially are usually available in Spanish and Chinese as well as English, with instructions on how to request help in other languages as well.

Thankfully though, this three part story features at least a small bit of karmic justice.
You see, physicists love to poke "light-hearted" fun at other disciplines. For example, when med students need to do their one, mandatory physics class, they lightheartedly make fun of the poor students memorizing three different versions of Ohm's law: U = R*I, U/I = R, and U/R = I.
"Look at them", they say, "can't be bothered to understand how to manipulate an equation, what silly little med students".
And then, they turn to their own majors, and say "If you want to understand field theory [the name they have given to the study of vector bundles], you'll need to remember these three laws: Green's Theorem, Gauss' theorem, and Stoke's theorem. They are very different theorems, so you will have to memorize all three of them separately, but they are all three very important".
But, dear reader, you know what they did there? They just did the very same thing they made fun of the need students for. As any mathematician will, happily, and at this point very justifiedly tell them, all three of theorems are actually Stoke's theorem. And, in a final act of cosmic justice, you know what the best part is? The reason the physicist didn't realize that is due to them not being able to be bothered to properly learn the fucking theory of fucking differential forms properly.

But it doesn't end here, oh no. Physicists aquire the super power of mathematical ignorance early on in their career, at the start of their undergrad.
You might have asked why, when calculating differentials we write d/dx as the operator. And maybe even have noticed that when calculating integrals, dx again shows up in the symbol for the operator. You might even have asked a mathematician about that, and they probably told you that it is merely a coincidence, just a funny symbol, with no deeper meaning, and you really should not ask more questions about that. It was technically a lie, but it was a lie meant to protect you. There is a deeper meaning behind the dx, but the theory you need for that, the theory of differential forms, is some seriously advanced stuff, using exterior products, derivations, exact sequences of modules, and cohomology. It's something that is better left for a graduate program.
Of course physicists are not deterred by that. Worse still, when you tell them, after thorough warning, about cohomology and exact sequences and all that, they tell BORING and go ahead and tell their freshmen to just use differential forms And not only that, they even tell them to divide two differential forms and pretend the result is well defined, "it's perfectly safe" they say. Of course, if a mathematician ever dared to divide differential forms, it would immediately blow up in their face and they would get seriously hurt. The mathematics is very clear on that. You can fill many many blackboards with counterexamples (wearing proper protective equipment, of course).
But when the freshmen physicists do it, they somehow are just fine. Don't get me wrong, it could definitely explode. It just doesn't. Because nature is trying to drive mathematicians insane.

A rant, brought to you by me being jet-lagged and awake at 3am.

You might have heard about how the sum of all positive integers is equal to -1/12. It is not. The Riemann zeta function, for complex numbers with a real part bigger than one can be written as a series, and that series converges and forms a complexly differentiable (aka holomorphic) function. Holomorphic functions, defined on an open set, can be extended further. It doesn't always work, but when it does (and in the case of the Riemann zeta function it does), that extension is unique, so you can discuss the value of the Riemann zeta function at places that have a real part smaller than 1, like for example -1. We can calculate what the value the function takes there is, it happens to be -1/12. But, and the math is very clear on this, that value has absolutely, definitely, positively nothing to with the series we used on the right half plane.
So what do quantum physicists do, when their little theory runs into the sum of all positive integers? They just ignore that fact and replace the sum by -1/12. So far, that would just be a cautionary tale of how you shouldn't ignore preconditions, but they then go ahead, go to their experimental physicist colleagues, and ask them to run an experiment. And nature, which, at this point has to be assumed to be in on the conspiracy to drive mathematicians mad, makes it so that the result of the experiment is -1/12 to some ridiculously low tolerance.

@argv_minus_one @inthehands it turns out, compilers are complicated. Compiler folks have tried, but piping an annotation like that through the entire LLVM stack is nontrivial, and there are only very few people trying to write cryptographic code, and very many people trying to write code that is as fast as possible, so the effort that was put into it by compiler folks had a bit of an upper bound. So in the end, godbolt.org is the cryptography engineer's best friend.

@inthehands on second thought, to expand and refine this point: as a cryptography engineer, I have a love-hate relationship with compilers, precisely because of this reason. Cryptography has the unusual requirement that code needs to be executed in constant time, and compilers do not consider that as an invariant. So part of my job is to dig through the assembly compilers spit out and look for conditional jumps.
And when the compiler gets too unreliable, I have to cut it out of the development process entirely and handwrite the assembly.

@inthehands this has been my biggest problem with all these AI assisted coding tools that have been shoved our collective throats. I'm always happy to see and test out new tools and techniques for writing code, but the tools have to be deterministic and "continuous". If I can't reliably trigger the same action twice, I cannot use it to write code and rather turn it off. If I can't use the performance on one task to predict the performance on a slightly different but very related task, I can't use the tool to help produce code.

I need to know exactly what I am telling the machine, either because I've handwritten the instructions, or because I know what the tool I use to create the instructions does to my input. That's why I love my compilers, but hate spicy autocomplete.