@[email protected] THANK YOU
I'm not thrilled about the decision. But it's not like they ever said anything more than "it's an experiment because we're interested in this" - as far as I'm aware.
It really feels like people are finding every excuse to go after Mozilla. That's not the way to do this. Criticise the harmful decisions, reward the good ones, and things like this? IMO, let it go.
It's not like they're leaving social media. This isn't about accountability. Presumably, they just decided they weren't properly equipped (or willing) to administrate a fully-fledged federated social network in the long term.
Posts
-
some guy: "3$/month hosting was too expensive for Mozilla"