@[email protected] ah yeah that's how people keep accessing Twitter in Brazil, just using free vpns
But I was thinking the censorship would come like that, blocking access to the client, in this case a website. If you just create another access point in another dns you're in again and the relays are not affected, are they?
Posts
-
How many domain names your government needs to block in order to censor an entire network? -
How many domain names your government needs to block in order to censor an entire network?@[email protected] oh I see, but I still don't understand how the nostr works
People's accounts are not limited to a single server, right? I can login with any client on any relay with my "key" and it will spread my posts as mine, right?
Why blocking some clients and some relays will block the network if people can just keep creating new relays and clients (each one with a new domain to be accessible) -
How many domain names your government needs to block in order to censor an entire network?@[email protected] what's mitra?
-
How many domain names your government needs to block in order to censor an entire network?@[email protected] but wasn't nostr easier to spread because you don't need a server?
How it works with this relay / hosted client thing?