@blog Also for objects and activities to be valid when fetched they need to have the content-type: application/activity+json header.

Currently https://colours.bots.edent.tel/posts/6733f30a-1e98-2f5d-95a4-814d541f3970.json returns application/json.

@blog From a quick read of the code:

Around https://gitlab.com/edent/activity-bot/-/blob/9fed3dff8b3f02c836a1e48ae02b40c3d74a057d/index.php#L815 Note construction seems to be missing the cc field, which is present in the Create activity, they need to match.

Around https://gitlab.com/edent/activity-bot/-/blob/9fed3dff8b3f02c836a1e48ae02b40c3d74a057d/index.php#L1039 means the mention part of the bot is Mastodon-specific as other servers don't use https://{$domain}/@{$user} and also will likely not work properly as it doesn't seems to add their ActivityPub IDs to to or cc fields.
Might be a better idea to have the bot client mention via raw ActivityPub IDs instead of @username@domain since that requires keeping a user database.

@hrefna Which in effect means that nobody can fully implement ActivityPub, and there isn't even some kind of strictly defined set that everyone would have to implement, everyone kind of just wings it.

@erincandescent Ooh neat! But well… not universal for mailing-lists to do NNTP.

And well discovery sucks:

$ curl -sSL https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/[email protected]/T/ | grep -e nntp: -e news:
$

@erincandescent Reminds me of why I quite like that lists.sr.ht has a "Forward this thread to me" button.
Which also allows to nicely reply to a thread you previously weren't in, although I just wish I could use NNTP for this…

@drewdevault I knew about this one but never used it because my time perception is awful.

@domi @easrng Wouldn't be surprised of it being super-legacy from pre-RFC1738 (December 1994).

@domi Kind of wonder if : being urlencoded is due to some pre-http legacy.
Or urgh, Windows.

@drewdevault Ah maybe on old versions for ladders where it's just a single texture against a block but I think they added some depth few versions latter.

@drewdevault Well at least it's still a pure block, unlike stairs/ladders/tall-grass/torches/fences/…

@liaizon @tusooa @chjara @eri Huh didn't even expect it to be used outside of Russia.

@tusooa @chjara @eri At least omp.ru and netup.ru are corporations so yeah they could be sanctioned.
Although netup.ru seems to be just a seller of set-top boxes, at least usually mil-tech usually boasts about it on their site.

@tusooa @chjara @eri Made me check and msu.ru is an university: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_State_University

@chjara @eri Well https://social.kernel.org/objects/860ef93c-229b-4070-8ee6-cb80d1f51337 points at them being employed by russian military industrial complex, which you entirely could publicly justify.
But then seeing Linus response… the hell.

@ariadne So I guess that's worse than risc-v, at least the VisionFive2 which has nearly entirely done their mainlining process (hence why I bought it).
While I couldn't find that for anything MilkV, their website is like sales-material with very little tech information, which doesn't makes me want to buy anything from them.

Loongarch… I'll have to check more but blobbed edk2 is kind of sad.

@ariadne Well Loongson also has history in providing machines without compromises to software freedom.

@alcinnz Meanwhile I'd more say that publishing code online is more a social contract / cultural expectation and one more relevant to communities (where the source control system should be at least as open at said community).
And not all libre software has a community.

@alcinnz Well of course OSI wouldn't have ②, it would fail both https://wiki.debian.org/DissidentTest and https://wiki.debian.org/DesertIslandTest hard.

Open-Source Definition being derived from Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG).