@ariadne @torvalds do you think grsecurity patches were not upstreamed before for technical reasons, personality clashes between Torvalds and Spender or both?

@theresnotime ah that's what Jeff Bezos was trying to achieve

@theresnotime hey, can I get a SERVFAIL invite?

@theresnotime it wasn't Sammy[disputed - discuss]

@makryfa live usb images should have an automatic shutdown after like a week (with earlier warnings) or so, to prevent this kind of accidents.

@mahryekuh usually I switch between manual typing and clicking buttons depending on my mood

@mahryekuh my point was more that if the intricacies of HTML were easy, we would not need these editors

so the existence of them proves people wrong who say HTML is easy

@mahryekuh if it was easy, why do even have CMSes?

@jwildeboer yeah

I can name zero leaders of the Python Software Foundation and that is a good thing

@theresnotime This is a personal message from Jimbo

pls donate more fops

@jessie I guess it depends. If you have an enterprise contract with Microsoft and use their Copilot AI for it, it doesn't change much in terms of confidentiality because they already have all your mails.

@tezoatlipoca @evan @internetarchive yep

@evan @internetarchive oh but you can donate, just look up the bank info page in the Wayback Machine while they are offline

oh wait

@polyfloyd sometimes there are things nobody asked for but everyone wanted

@Peternimmo @donnodubus @festal to me, this merely emphasizes the need for open access science: if we accept it as normal that your sources are paywalled, then how can we easily verify the claims? it should be trivial to verify in seconds. Now we do trust the AI sources because they give a trustworthy impression. (I mean here: a completely false title to a non-existing article, not an AI generated source article)

@Peternimmo @donnodubus @festal It does ban _sources_ that are generated with AI, and any content on Wikipedia needs to be verifiable. So I would argue that it is already banned in essence, this cleanup act is not really different from removing regular spam, except it is a bit harder to detect.

@slightlyoff @mahryekuh @bobmonsour @zachleat @phae @owa Meh, JS is fine, just keep it to reasonable size and prefer CSS alternatives