@noracodes I'm actually halfway expecting one of the govs trying to subvert encryption to try exactly that - threaten liability for unknowingly hosting
Posts
-
I've spoken before about some of the challenges I see regarding true decentralization for #Bluesky. -
I've spoken before about some of the challenges I see regarding true decentralization for #Bluesky.@noracodes The blocklist stuff is definitely interesting, modulo the normal maintenance/reputation/collateral-damage problems
I'm actually thinking more along the lines of e.g. CSAM reporting (well, really anything traditionally requiring some level of content removal), esp as that interacts with what you mentioned WRT paid IPFS hosting (and, as a corollary, the kind of people willing to risk hosting CSAM for a fee)
-
I've spoken before about some of the challenges I see regarding true decentralization for #Bluesky.@noracodes And for every p2p chat setup - especially the ones heavily reliant on IPFS - there's also the entire mechanism of moderation missing.
In Bluesky-land that's not only entirely performed by Bluesky PBC, architecturally that's all done in the appview and feed layers. I have absolutely no idea how to even approximate that with user-managed PKI