@thisismissem That would be nice. But so far the intention seems to be to rely on the Invited Experts system, which is how I currently contribute to Working Groups.
Posts
-
It appears the W3C want to clamp down on Community Groups (as opposed to Working Groups with fee-paying members) which publish specifications https://github.com/w3c/tpac2024-breakouts/issues/63 -
It appears the W3C want to clamp down on Community Groups (as opposed to Working Groups with fee-paying members) which publish specifications https://github.com/w3c/tpac2024-breakouts/issues/63It appears the W3C want to clamp down on Community Groups (as opposed to Working Groups with fee-paying members) which publish specifications https://github.com/w3c/tpac2024-breakouts/issues/63
Proposals include enforcing that a specification with traction has to move to an SDO https://github.com/w3c/cg-council/labels/revamp-2024