• Home
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Tags
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Documentation
    • Home
    • Read API
    • Write API
    • Plugin Development
Skins
  • Light
  • Default
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Quartz
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor
Collapse

Community

BaerrusB

Baerrus

@Baerrus
About
Posts
43
Topics
7
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

    RE: SEO Problrm with Heading Structure : No H1, H2 and H3
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    What pages specifically do you refer to?


  • RE: NodeBB is expensive
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    If you have the numbers just post them.


  • RE: Submitting a Pull Request to NodeBB? Contributor License Agreement
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    Guys, could you take a look at pull requests pls?

    https://github.com/NodeBB/NodeBB/pull/2926

    Btw, I did sign CLA before. Though CLAhub lately just errors out


  • RE: config.json updated, `base_url` and `relative_path` no longer exist
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    @frissdiegurke Knowing what I know now, @julian post can be construed to contain all the information :). I would word it differently though as SSO is probably veyr widely used. And if so, then calling port optional is...well, still technically correct.


  • RE: config.json updated, `base_url` and `relative_path` no longer exist
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    Finally upgraded to 0.6.1 from 0.5.7. First I added the port (in my case 8080) to the URL string as described in this thread. That screwed up SSO. Both google and facebook. After, I went back and manually added "port" setting into config.json, SSO seems functional. This appears to be a bug or a logical conflict. Basically SSO is not functional unless your URL string is exactly how you access nodeBB from the outside.


  • RE: Ghost Category
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    That brings up a feature request. I would like to have an unlisted category. A perfectly ordinary category, just not listed on the home page. Something where I want to list some basic reference information, which is not important enough to keep on the Home page. Is there a way to achieve that?


  • RE: Improvements in mobile usability
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    @xtech If you have an example where mobile scrolling is implemented well within a browser, please post a link


  • RE: Template/logic: IF ELSE inside another IF ELSE
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    @agarcia17 I looked at templates.js library. I do not think it supports that now.

    https://github.com/psychobunny/templates.js/blob/master/lib/templates.js


  • RE: npm ERR! extraneous: [email protected]
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    I got it, now that I understand what installs redis.

    The way I upgrade is I create a brand new workspace, install a new version of nodebb, copy over the config.json. I think that makes sense in real deployment scenario versus executing "git pull" in place. This way I retain a fully functional prior version installation I can fall back to in a instant should something fail with a new version.


  • RE: npm ERR! extraneous: [email protected]
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    @dwn Maybe that is the problem. I copied config.json from another workspace instead of running ./nodebb setup


  • npm ERR! extraneous: [email protected]
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    After checking out v0.5.x

    waterloo:NodeBB vlad$ npm ll

    npm ERR! extraneous: [email protected] /Users/vlad/workspace/nodebb/0.5.7/NodeBB/node_modules/redis
    npm ERR! extraneous: [email protected] /Users/vlad/workspace/nodebb/0.5.7/NodeBB/node_modules/connect-redis
    npm ERR! extraneous: [email protected] /Users/vlad/workspace/nodebb/0.5.7/NodeBB/node_modules/redis
    npm ERR! not ok code 0

    SHouldn't redis package be an explicit dependency?


  • RE: header.tpl changes
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    @baris I started working on a more SEO friendly theme/plugin. I hoped I could keep all the changes within a lavender derived theme, but I cannot. Some changes will be in the core. FOr example, server side rendered pagination. I am looking for some advice on how to coordinate making changes in a theme and core nodebb?


  • RE: New from-scratch theme
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    I think some sections of nodeBB forum are styled independently from the current theme. Like admin area. So getting rid of less completely may be hard.


  • RE: SEO plugin needed
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    Not to harp on the topic. Just pointing out because it may have been misunderstood. - I wanted to pay money to someone for fixing all the SEO issues. I guess, if nobody wants my hard cold cash, I am going to have to do that myself. @julian @baris watch out for a new contributor.


  • RE: SEO plugin needed
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    @jonathanmh I did not get that. Could you give us an example?


  • RE: SEO plugin needed
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    @baris Though elsewhere you guys use cgi params. Like ?page=3


  • RE: SEO plugin needed
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    @Xiph Thanks for pointing that out. Indeed looks like google disregards meta:keywords http://www.metatags.org/google_ignores_meta_tags_in_ranking

    Here is my problem. My forum has been up for 2+ months now (http://optionsforum.net). But it still gets no search traffic. This is not my first site, so I know what to expect. I looked at google webmaster. It turns out google seems to have trouble understanding what is important. For example, Google thinks that word 'ago' is one of the most important keywords on my forum because every reply has a little date tag under it that reads like 'posted 2 days ago'. So I guess my question is do we have a nodebb based site with high page rank that gets a lot of organic search traffic?


  • RE: SEO plugin needed
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    @baris Why not or you are referring to paginating a long topic? If so you could do /topic?page=5#300


  • RE: SEO plugin needed
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    @julian Thanks for the pointers. You reminded me about another thing in nodebb which trips up google. Lets say we have a topic mysite.org/topic/5/my-topic-name. Say it has 5 replies. To get a link at an individual reply looks like this:

    mysite.org/topic/5/my-topic-name/3 <-- This is bad. Because for google it looks like a duplicate page of mysite.org/topic/5/my-topic-name. A more SEO friendly way and perhaps the correct way from HTML point of view is to use hash tags like mysite.org/topic/5/my-topic-name#3. All this hash tagging is completely transparent for servers.


  • SEO plugin needed
  • BaerrusB Baerrus

    Folks, we really need a SEO plugin. I would be willing to send a donation to whoever gets to work on that. I am sure there is a dozen webmasters around here who could do the same. This work would benefits the whole community greatly.

    plugin Functionality:

    • Fine gained control of how Title element is constructed
    • Intelligent construction of keywords meta tag
    • Adding ALT tag to all images. Markdown does not support alt= at all.
    • Google has recently announced they would also use rel="next" and rel="prev" link elements in the head section of your paginated archives.
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Home
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Tags
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Documentation
    • Home
    • Read API
    • Write API
    • Plugin Development
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.