@UlrikeHahn looks like a reply but no @‘s made it this end
Posts
-
still not sure I understand completely what you are saying, but the epistemological difference feels like this: -
I am humbled to announce that I have been invited to speak at the European summit on Laser Optics and Photonics Technology (ELOPS-2024) in the same week I've been asked to contribute to the Mega Journal on Oncology@UlrikeHahn I'm thrilled to congratulate you - mega well done lol
-
Suppose there are six social networking services, A, B, C, D, E, and F.@UlrikeHahn That's interesting - so could add some idea of affiliation or broaden the notion of protocol so it's sociotechnical, for example?
-
Suppose there are six social networking services, A, B, C, D, E, and F.Suppose there are six social networking services, A, B, C, D, E, and F.
A and B use protocol p.
C uses protocol q
D uses protocol r.
E and F use protocol s.A and B can communicate using p.
B and C can communicate using q.
D can only communicate with itself.
E and F can communicate using s.
There are no other connections between services.Where is the fediverse here? Are there multiple fediverses depending on connections?
-
I have a conjecture about Mastodon users.Well, my conjecture that it would be 100% has been falsified. That'll teach me.
-
I have a conjecture about Mastodon users.I have a conjecture about Mastodon users. Have you heard of xkcd? Boost for a large convenience sample.