@julian @mario @jupiter_rowland @benpate @fentiger @scott>Would you consider relaxing this to allow for situations (e.g. forums) where the conversation thread starter is not necessarily the manager of the container?As far as I know, in Streams OP and owner are identical, but you are right - they might as well be different. I'll mention this in the FEP.>I haven't seen collectionOf in the wild before, what purpose does it serve here?Again, this is what Streams does, I'm guessing this is because some context collections contain posts and not activities, and collectionOf tells you how to parse the collection without resorting to duck typing.I would prefer to use an outbox property for containers.

@silverpill @mikedev @julian the default assumption should not be "full representation", because you can never have the entire set of knowable facts about a given subject.what we should strive for instead is to make sure that any representation served is useful. this is not the same thing as it being "full". for example, there may be private attributes that are not being served.

@julian @thisismissem @trwnh makes sense as well for “followers only”… if you post a post with abuse and include someone.. It *could* reach the somebody and all of their followers as well boosted via their server (with controls. Opens the abuse vector slightly.

Ah it looks like this was covered by Angus' post over on SocialHub