I figured out how to describe my complaint with the @osi's OS AI definition: it treats open source and freely licensed as equivalent in all cases. But they're not. The checklist says you can provide a black box model under a free license as long as you document it. That isn't open source though because I don't have the original source, i.e. the dataset. It fails the second criteria of the OSD, i e. Source code.As I've said previously, I think there are situations where freely licensed but well documented models might be justifiable. We as a community should have a way to recognize freely licensed models that do have that legitimate limitation. But it's not "open source" https://opensource.org/deepdive/drafts/the-open-source-ai-definition-checklist-draft-v-0-0-9