@jwildeboer @GossiTheDog @dangoodin Ah ok, I see. Yes well, when he posted that, he just took the communicated value. I can understand that somewhere, regardless of how inflated the announcement was.
Posts
-
FYI: Red Hat blog post on the CUPS vulnerability at https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/red-hat-response-openprinting-cups-vulnerabilities Security Bulletin at https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/RHSB-2024-002?extIdCarryOver=true&sc_cid=701f2... -
FYI: Red Hat blog post on the CUPS vulnerability at https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/red-hat-response-openprinting-cups-vulnerabilities Security Bulletin at https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/RHSB-2024-002?extIdCarryOver=true&sc_cid=701f2...@jwildeboer @GossiTheDog @dangoodin Maybe I just didn't understand it. In other words, he is referring to an initial CVSS base score that does not apply to his finding, but he claims it is confirmed?
-
FYI: Red Hat blog post on the CUPS vulnerability at https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/red-hat-response-openprinting-cups-vulnerabilities Security Bulletin at https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/RHSB-2024-002?extIdCarryOver=true&sc_cid=701f2... -
FYI: Red Hat blog post on the CUPS vulnerability at https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/red-hat-response-openprinting-cups-vulnerabilities Security Bulletin at https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/RHSB-2024-002?extIdCarryOver=true&sc_cid=701f2...@jwildeboer @GossiTheDog @dangoodin quote: "I wouldn’t classify it as a 9.9"