I just realized that I don't need to argue with y'all about:
-
Yes.
I never saw the "I refuse to talk about QTs!" version. I've only ever known the more mature "How do we do QTs safely? And where would you stack rank the QTs feature in importance relative to say, providing more actionable information for moderators, or helping users choose a safe first server?" version.
-
Robert Burgholzerreplied to Emelia πΈπ» last edited by
@thisismissem @chirpbirb @mekkaokereke @esk
How does one contribute to the hachyderm/nivenly bounty program? -
Esk πβ‘πreplied to Robert Burgholzer last edited by
@rburghol @thisismissem @chirpbirb @mekkaokereke we did a soft launch test to try out the process - we're planning on formally launching in December!
the fund will be modest to start during the pilot, but if we get good signal/participation, we'll look to expand it further.
-
@esk @rburghol @chirpbirb @mekkaokereke oh, awesome! I wasn't sure if it'd gotten canned or not. Glad to hear it's continuing though!
-
@thisismissem "canned" temporarily bc i got busy
but we (nivenly board) agreed to set a budget for the pilot just the other day. i'll dust off the docs & do a blog post after the US thanksgiving holiday.
-
@esk nice!
-
:PUA: Shlee fucked around andreplied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by
@mekkaokereke Mastodev sure do seem to be allergic to fundraising in bulk and I've been begging them for years....
-
Mark Kraftreplied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by
@mekkaokereke I'm all for something like starter packs, but the devil is in the details. There appears to be serious server issues that starter packs could potentially exacerbate, if not addressed first.
-
mekka okereke :verified:replied to Mark Kraft last edited by
Yes, that's a real issue, but has nothing to do with starter packs.
mekka okereke :verified: (@[email protected])
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] Yeah, no doubt. I'm less concerned about the server software itself scaling, and more concerned about some of the protocol and implementation decisions. I.e., the "They call it Mastodon, because when a big account posts a link hosted on your server, it generates a preview by sending a thundering herd to come and trample your server!" The server software is too interesting a project for the Rust / Elixir / Go and EngProd / SRE crowd to not obsess about performance.
Hachyderm.io (hachyderm.io)
If we picture a world with 500M people on Mastodon, the infra design breaks a lot of smaller sites. Conversely, BlueSky's infra choices don't break smaller sites. I do love your focus on what it means for Fediverse to be a better Internet citizen.
"Mastodon only works because it's not popular! Stop making it popular!" is probably not the message we should lead with.
-
Mastodon Migrationreplied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by [email protected]
From the admittedly small experience so far with Follow Packs feel like the issues we need to address to make packs work and be safe is both consent and size.
People need a way to remove themselves if they don't want to be listed.
Packs need to be manageable in size. It they are too big the originator can't possibly do a good job when issues arise.
Too big also makes them potentially more problematic both technically and socially.
1/n
-
Mastodon Migrationreplied to Mastodon Migration last edited by
Be very curious your thoughts on groupings and the potential for targeted abuse. So far the follow packs are things like astronomy. No one goes after astronomers. But when packs start grouping accounts by race and gender there may be targeting issues. Should this be a particular concern, or is it just a part of the overall moderation and abuse issue?
-
@mastodonmigration @mekkaokereke It seems to me that people need to not just be recommended to, say, an author they like, but also to people they can legitimately befriend and interact with, who are followers / active commenters.
New users can't expect to generate a lot of friends, comments, etc. from professional content creators.
Generating a limited deck of varying but relevant people might be more useful for all concerned than a pure top-40 list.
-
mekka okereke :verified:replied to Mark Kraft last edited by
I'll be honest... Guys on Mastodon that don't even know what starter packs are, but spout off about them based on half knowledge of what they think they are, are really annoying. Like, super annoying.
Starter packs are created by users and contain micro-communities. They're not just giant influencer follow lists. Which is part of why there are *more* person to person conversations on BlueSky than Mastodon. Much more. It's not close.
-
mekka okereke :verified:replied to Mastodon Migration last edited by
It's part of the overall moderation and abuse issues.
It's not that hard to figure out how to give users control over if they are included in starter packs or not. BlueSky hasn't done this yet, but should.
It's not that hard to moderate accounts that make starter packs for the purpose of abusing other users.
But even still, there are like 15 more important abuse vectors that need to be closed down before I worry about starter packs.
-
mekka okereke :verified:replied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by
Here's how starter packs really work:
Suppose you stayed on Twitter because you ran a local model airplane club, and your club met and chatted and DM'd there. The club had 80 members.
30 moved to BlueSky, but most of the convos are still on TwitterYou make a starter pack called "[town name] model airplane club." You put the 30 who moved to BlueSky in it. The starter pack is now attached to your account. It makes it easier for the other 50 people to join BlueSky.
-
mekka okereke :verified:replied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by
You make a thread on Twitter saying, "This is the last post on Twitter for [Town name] model airplane club. It's been a good run! You can find me on Blue Sky. Click on my starter pack to follow everyone."
That's how communities are moving to Blue Sky from Twitter, and not missing a beat.
-
Mastodon Migrationreplied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by
Yes. This is the right model for starter packs. Think of them as seeds. When you follow a group of people from a particular topical area. You quickly get boosted posts of others with related interests, who you can follow if they appeal to you. The important thing is to get a critical mass.
As discussed above if the pack is too big it generates kind of an overload and is hard for the pack originator to manage.
Feel like the best size is around 25 accounts.
1/n
-
Mastodon Migrationreplied to Mastodon Migration last edited by
The other thing, and don't know if Bluesky does this, but they should load into a list. Again, experience from the last few days, this is critical. See example below. The Astronomy follow packs load into a list called "Astro" this becomes a "feed" that whenever you want to see what is going on in astronomy you can click on the Astro list. You can also add other astronomy accounts to the list. Additional packs can also be loaded. The list functionality is important.
-
Mastodon Migrationreplied to mekka okereke :verified: last edited by
Thanks. That is good feedback.