#BlueSky isn't decentralised or federated.
-
Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:replied to Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: last edited by
And as I am experimenting with local AI and run one of the #Granite models on my laptop, I asked it about the difference between Mastodon and Bluesky. Well:
"The main difference between Mastodon and Bluesky is that Mastodon is a decentralized platform with local instances, while Bluesky is a centralized platform with a single, global network."
-
Kuba Suder • @mackuba.eu on 🦋replied to Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: last edited by
@jwildeboer you can absolutely run your own relay and people have already done that for testing at least
-
Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:replied to Kuba Suder • @mackuba.eu on 🦋 last edited by
@mackuba Sure. At some point in the future all of Bluesky will be fully decentralised and reach federation levels that the ActivityStream already has And that point is a moving target since years.
-
Kuba Suder • @mackuba.eu on 🦋replied to Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: last edited by
@jwildeboer I won't argue that it isn't as decentralized in practice as AP right now, I'm just saying that "they promise that in future you might be able to run your own relay" is misleading, because you can do that today
-
Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:replied to Kuba Suder • @mackuba.eu on 🦋 last edited by [email protected]
@mackuba And, as you said, that is for testing ATM. And the other argument with the did:plc still stands. Anyway, right now Bluesky is by all practical means centralised and I am not convinced that will really change. ATProto stays a proprietary, non-open standard, owned by a non-open organisation, not a community or SSO (Standard Setting Organisation) IMHO.
-
Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:replied to Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: last edited by
@mackuba "The author mentions that setting up a Relay requires around 4.5 TB of disk space, and that it’s growing by around 18 GB a day. However, that was said before the most recent bump in growth. The data and processing requirements will only accelerate as more people use the service." - https://anderegg.ca/2024/11/15/maybe-bluesky-has-won
-
Jiří Fiala Total Landscapingreplied to Kuba Suder • @mackuba.eu on 🦋 last edited by
@mackuba @jwildeboer relay, yes. So Bsky is just offloading networking costs onto the users, while keeping power.
-
Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:replied to Jiří Fiala Total Landscaping last edited by [email protected]
-
Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:replied to Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: last edited by [email protected]
The more I look at ATproto, the "standard" behind Bluesky, the more I see vague promises of full decentralisation and federation that "currently" are implemented in centralised ways, because "right now" they "unfortunately" have to do it that way. No clear roadmap on when these centralised elements will be removed/replaced. Now if a "standard" allows for such fundamental deviations, I cannot take it serious. That's just me, though.
-
Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:replied to Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: last edited by
I also fail to see a lot of community uptake on creating alternative implementations of ATproto. Compared to the creative chaos around ActivityPub/ActivityStreams it definitely feels more like a walled garden.
-
Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:replied to Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: last edited by [email protected]
So, in conclusion and IMHO, BlueSky is a successful Twitter alternative.
The Fediverse including Mastodon is not. The fediverse is a fundamentally different and bigger thing due to its truly federated nature.
And both can have their place in the market of attention.
One ultimately is a commercial endeavour while the other is not. But for the general audience that simply is not the decisive factor. One can find that A Bad Thing, or one can shrug and move on in ones preferred direction
-
Juha Auteroreplied to Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: last edited by
@jwildeboer It's also Twitter alternative in the sense that there is nothing to stop it becoming similar cesspool as Twitter.
-
Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:replied to Juha Autero last edited by
@jautero Yes. But we also have quite our share of trolls, misogynists, racists and haters in the Fediverse. Most instance admins I know however care a lot about keeping them blocked and away from their users.
-
⁂ Justin (StayGrounded.online)replied to Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: last edited by
@jwildeboer @jautero Yes exactly, Mastodon has mechanisms that prevent it from turning into a cesspool.
-
Bryan Ruby 🌤️replied to ⁂ Justin (StayGrounded.online) last edited by
@JustinH @jwildeboer @jautero Bluesky too has put a lot of thought toward moderation. Both Mastodon and Bluesky are similar in that they’re light on algorithms and when in use are voluntary. Threads on the other hand despite connecting to the #fediverse is a bigger “cesspool” in your feed magnet due to relying on Meta algorithms. I plan to drop my Threads account once they have enough ActivityPub features to allow me to fully engage desired accounts via Mastodon.
-
⁂ Justin (StayGrounded.online)replied to Bryan Ruby 🌤️ last edited by
@bryanruby @jwildeboer @jautero How does moderation on BlueSky work?
I agree Threads shouldn't even be in the discussion but for the same reasons BlueSky shouldn't.
-
Bryan Ruby 🌤️replied to ⁂ Justin (StayGrounded.online) last edited by
Bluesky has basic tools moderation tools you would expect (block, mute, warn, etc) you would come to expect. But they also have a labeling system (both official and allows for third-party) that allows users to report on users/posts. For instance I can use a third-party labeler to block Broncos fans (for real). All of this is voluntary for the user to use or not use. Basic image below. An example of “advanced” is Bluesky’s own:
https://bsky.app/profile/moderation.bsky.app -
Additional information can be found at Bluesky. The second link is a recent Verge article that talks about the “extras” you can do within Bluesky.
Here’s some cool stuff you can do with Bluesky
Bluesky offers a lot of unique features like algorithmic feeds and custom moderation that can make for a rich, in-control experience for users.
The Verge (www.theverge.com)
-
Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:replied to Bryan Ruby 🌤️ last edited by [email protected]
@bryanruby It's not a very transparent system, though, IMHO. Users in Germany get a "required" second labeler, that doesn't tell you what it is doing (I can make an educated guess, though, as I know German laws on illegal content like Holocaust denial, Nazi symbols etc.) @JustinH @jautero
-
Bryan Ruby 🌤️replied to Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange: last edited by
@jwildeboer @JustinH @jautero Looks like the “German version” is doing nothing at the moment. It would have labels on that page if it did something. As far as I can tell..not an expert.